Essay/Term paper: Review of john updike's review "it was sad"
Essay, term paper, research paper: Book Reports
Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on Book Reports: Review Of John Updike's Review "It Was Sad", you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.
Review of John Updike's Review "It Was Sad"
I chose to review John Updike's Review "It Was Sad" from the October 14th issue
of "The New Yorker". In the review, Updike examines several works concerning
the tragedy of the Titanic. He cites these works, I feel, to support his own
opinion about the event, and the different accounts of what really happened.
Updike spends some time disproving the belief that the upper class male
passengers heroically sacrificed their own seats on the lifeboats for those less
fortunate than themselves. He even points out, who he feels, are the real
heroes in this catastrophe. This shows he is writing from a moral perspective,
relating to these works.
He definitely takes the position of the lower class of American society as this
time in history, and even brings up the topic of racism and sexism in the recall
of the event. It seems that the ships crew and the lower class passengers were
the most courageous in the eventful two and half hours it took for the ship to
totally go under. He provides quotes from the various selections, one being the
statistics of death, by class. These statistics show that, in actuality, more
of the upper class passengers survived than the lower classes (by both
percentage, and total people).
Updike also examines, in depth, the cultural effect of the sinking of the
Titanic. The thought that a ship declared unsinkable going down on its first
voyage was at the very least, shocking to the public. Who could look at
invention and progress in the same way? Updike seems to point out that the
public at this time is naive and quick to make idealistic judgments.
He also refers to the passengers moral standpoints, describing the decisions
they made not only during the ship's final hours but also during the whole trip.
To further prove his point, he gives the testimony included in one of the books,
concerning a Senator who heard the screaming of the suffering passengers but
made no attempt to rescue them. The people on that half filled life boat
refused to return for other, offering the excuse that they could have been
injured by the crowd. He gives other similar examples of such acts. It seems to
me that Updike not only wanted to review the events of the disaster, but also
make a statement about social classes and their values. I feel that he
presented an accurate description of the American cultural scene at that time.